Amateur screenplay Scion had a promising first ten pages, enough to get a few dozen e-mails of endorsement. Let’s find out how the rest of the script held up.

Amateur Friday Submission Process: To submit your script for an Amateur Review, send in a PDF of your script, a PDF of the first ten pages of your script, your title, genre, logline, and finally, why I should read your script. Use my submission address please: Carsonreeves3@gmail.com. Your script and “first ten” will be posted. If you’re nervous about the effect of a bad review, feel free to use an alias name and/or title. It’s a good idea to resubmit every couple of weeks so your submission stays near the top.

Genre: Supernatural/Drama
Premise: (from writer) A naive young man’s dreams of a normal life is hijacked by a charismatic “faith healer” and a powerful media tycoon when both become hell bent on exploiting the young man’s amazing gift…the power to raise the dead.
About: Picked this script as it was one of the few amateur scripts I’ve sent out in my newsletter that I’ve gotten positive responses on. Most of those were based on the first 10 pages. Intrigued to see if the story was sustained afterwards.
Writer: Scotty Davis
Details: 128 pages

Andrew-Garfield-andrew-garfield-19928698-486-300Andrew Garfield for Caleb?

There’s a chorus from an old popular sitcom that goes, “You take the good, you take the bad, you take them all and then you have…the facts of life.” That’s sort of how you have to approach amateur screenplays. You’re only going to find that home run every 2-3 years. In the interim, you’re going to find a lot of screenplays that do some good things, but also some bad things. So as Scion started to lose focus, I had to remember that I wasn’t judging an Aaron Sorkin script here. This was a writer still learning the craft, and therefore he was going to make some mistakes.

Just the fact that so many people were able to read his first 10 pages and recommend the script to me was a great achievement for Scotty. But, unfortunately, it’s not the true mark of a good writer (or I should say, “a good writer YET.”). For that to be the case, you have to be able to tell a story all the way through. And that mainly means understanding structure. To tell a story, you need to know how to set up, how to build, and how to conclude, and that’s where I felt Scion fell short. Let’s take a look.

We open on Charlie Thompson racing his wife, Charlotte, to the hospital. She’s gone into labor and it’s one of the ugly kinds. Lots of bloooood. It doesn’t help that there’s a massive thunderstorm fighting them on their way there, and when they get to the hospital, it takes out all the electricity. The doctor does his best anyway, however as he’s helping Charlotte, a lightning flash COMES THROUGH the roof and grabs hold of her. Charlotte dies, but the baby, who we’ll come to know as Caleb, survives.

Turns out that lightning strike left some after effects. Caleb has the power to bring the dead back to life with just his touch. He uses this at first with animals, but eventually starts saving people as well. It doesn’t always work for some reason. But either way, his father, a religious man, tells him he has to be careful with his power. It’s not up to him to decide who lives and dies.  That’s God’s decision.

Across the country there’s an up-and-coming 7 year old preacher named Levi Hawkins (yes, 7). Levi heals people too, in front of hundreds every week at church. He’s got a gift for turning people into believers but unlike Caleb, Levi’s healing isn’t real. His father manufacturers backstage deals with fake cripples to be “cured” and it’s made Levi a hot commodity, so much so that he gets his own TV show.

But that show falls apart when it’s clear these Healing specials aren’t getting the ratings they used to. Both Levi and Caleb continue to grow up, and then, when they’re young men, happen to be driving on the same road at the same time and crash into each other. Levi dies a bloody death but Caleb jumps out and pulls one of his life-gripper moves, bringing Levi back to the light. Aha, Levi thinks.  This gives him an idea.

Levi whips up a new type of sermon, enlisting a reluctant Caleb as his helper. Levi isn’t just going to heal people this time around. He’s going to bring them back from the dead! Folks are naturally skeptical, but discreetly using Caleb’s touch, Levi’s able to back up his claims. Soon reality TV comes calling. They want to put his show on the air, and they think it’s going to be so big, they want to put it on post-Super Bowl, the biggest time slot of them all! The question is, will the reluctant Caleb do the show? Or will Levi be standing out there on his own?

First I want to point out the good things about Scion. Like I said, there’s a reason this was chosen off its first 10 pages. The writing is really crisp, really visual. I love how Scotty sets a mood and a sense of place. I was right there in that scene with Charlie rushing his pregnant wife to a hospital with a raging thunderstorm outside. It felt authentic. And it was CLEAR. I can’t stress how important that is. I was talking with a friend the other day about how some writers have clean easy-to-read writing styles and others have clunky styles, the kind where you have to read a paragraph twice every half page or so to understand what was said. Scotty’s writing was smooth and strong.

I liked his dialogue too. The thing with dialogue is you don’t always know why you like it. And some dialogue that people love, others hate. But I guess I liked this dialogue because it felt right. It felt like that’s the kind of thing these characters would say. For example, when the Sheriff comes to Charlie’s house looking for Caleb, this simple exchange follows: “I’m here about the boy, Charlie.” “My boy ain’t none of your business.” “Charlie, ain’t a soul in this county laid eyes on your boy in over three months. Folks around here just worried ‘bout him, that’s all.” This may seem like nothing special, but I read tons of scripts where writers would’ve written something like: “I’m here about your son.” “You don’t have permission to check on my son.” “I’m just doing what the office tells me, Charlie. Now let me in.”  Small differences, but those difference MAKE a difference.  It just goes to show how delicate dialogue can be.

On the downside, there are quite a few things that need to be shored up here. Not to beat a dead horse, but 129 pages on an amateur script raises red flags. It almost always means that the writer doesn’t know how to focus his story and that a lot of unnecessary scenes or subplots will be included. I hate to make that generalization, but it’s almost universally true, and lo and behold, it was the case here in spades.

There’s no real goal in Scion. It’s structured more like an artsy character study, with us following two characters’ lives, Caleb and Levi (as well as a TV producer, who I didn’t get into in the plot breakdown). There’s no rule that says you have to abide by popular dramatic structure, of course, but when you’re building your script around a high concept idea, such as this one, you probably want to play close to the rules. Goals, stakes, urgency. And there really wasn’t any of that here. It wasn’t until late in the story that a true destination was introduced, that being the Super Bowl show, and that had its own series of problems.

As I’ve said on this site before, no matter how good you are with structure, character, and dialogue, the strength of your story usually boils down to interesting and smart choices. You can have a character with a perfectly executed character arc. But if he’s an uninspired boring character, we won’t care. I felt Scotty made a lot of strange choices here that ultimately derailed the story. I thought the whole car crash between the characters was too coincidental. I thought a 7 year old preacher seemed far-fetched. This whole subplot about twins was unnecessarily confusing and never fit in. And then the Super Bowl show felt way too big for a story that had previously existed on an understated plain. At one point in Scion, even the CIA showed up.

If I were Scotty, I’d try to ground this more. Stop trying to infuse it with strange twin twists and the Central Intelligence Agency and Super bowl shows. It smells like you got bored with your own story and tried to throw in a lot of whammies in hopes that it would spice things up. But all it’s done is ruin the story’s focus.

I also think a lot of things could’ve been explained better. Scotty’s actual writing is clear. But there were certain story-related points that were left out or weren’t explained. I was constantly confused about how old the characters were as they aged, for example. I still don’t know if they’re 16 or 25 by the end of the story. Or Caleb’s power. I thought the whole reason he had that power was because the lightning struck his mom as she was giving birth. But then it turns out Charlie has the power too? And I’m still not clear on what the little snake birthmark meant.

Which leaves us in a difficult place. There’s clearly talent on display here, but also a lot of messiness, and more importantly, a lack of focus. Moving forward, I would suggest we come up with a simple goal, or at least individual goals driving each of the characters. Maybe Charlie left Caleb in a lot of debt, and Caleb has to find a way to save his chicken farm before [x] date. Maybe the fallen Levi has a one-shot pitch opportunity with a network for a show in [x] amount of days. He needs something to knock their socks off, and he hears about Caleb’s powers, so he goes and recruits him. With Caleb desperate for money, he has no choice but to join Levi.

These are off the top of my head, and admittedly generic, but they’re a good place to start. We need some sort of form to the story, because right now there isn’t any. And all of this stuff needs to be set up sooner. We can’t dwell too much on their growing up. I would get us further into their lives much faster so we can introduce these goals early on and set the story on track as soon as possible.

Scotty could be a force to reckon with in a couple of years. But he’s gotta work on the structure side of things before he can get there. I wish him luck! :)

[ ] what the hell did I just read?
[x] wasn’t for me
[ ] worth the read
[ ] impressive
[ ] genius

What I learned: Beware the big late arriving plot point. I’ve seen these in a few scripts recently and I saw it here too. When you try to introduce a big idea as a plot point late in the movie, it never feels natural. That’s because you don’t have time to nurture and grow the plot point, and therefore it feels crammed into the final act. That was the case with the Super Bowl development (in my opinion). It just seemed to come out of nowhere late in the script. The bigness of a plot point like this requires a lot of set up to justify its existence, and you don’t have the time to do all that set-up so late in the story. That’s probably why it felt so out of place.

  • Poe_Serling

    A script called Wednesday reviewed on Tuesday… A date with a hobbit rather than Ryan Gosling… now the Amateur Friday script on Thursday…

    You’re taking this ‘reverse-ironic’ thing a bit far, Carson. :-)

    • thescreenplayman

      Yeah. Don’t like the change in schedule, but that pretty much sums up the film business for you. Fickle, fickle, fickle. Thanks Carson for giving us the most important lesson of all.

    • Mb

      Guess that means we have to stay on our toes. ;-) I was going to read this one today, so I could comment on ti tomorrow…I’ll probably still read it though, or at least the first 10, because it sounds like parts of it are pretty good.

      • Poe_Serling

        It will be interesting to see what Carson has up his sleeve for tomorrow… possibly a doomsday thriller. ;-)

        • Ambrose*

          I think today’s post by Carson will be the last one…forever.

          Right now he is frantically running for higher ground, trying to be one of the few who survive the Mayan prophecy of apocalypse predicted for Friday.

          I hope they have an In-And-Out Burger wherever he finds refuge.

          • Poe_Serling

            lol.

            I also buy into mad genius Klmn’s ‘unstuck in time’ theory to explain the erratic postings of Carson this week. Everyone knows of C’s legendary geekiness regarding time travel…

            So, he may have just went the Christopher Reeve route (note the not-so-subtle similarities in their names) and Somewhere in Time(d) himself back into the past…

            Oh, let’s venture a guess… perhaps 1948… Baldwin Park, CA… bellying up to the drive-thru window at a new food establishment owned by Harry and Esther Synder…

          • Ambrose*

            If he has a young Jane Seymour waiting for him I can’t blame him at all.
            I’d forget all about the In-And-Out burgers.

          • Poe_Serling

            That would be an interesting ? to ask Carson… can you have a ‘lady friend’ with Jane Seymour-ish looks and stil eat all the In-and-Out burgers you want? :-)

          • carsonreeves1

            I’ll give you the answer to this one in a few months!

          • Poe_Serling

            I understand competely. :-)

          • klmn

            Mad geniuses don’t get enough screen time, while superheroes get too much.

          • Poe_Serling

            I hear you!

          • carsonreeves1

            This week has been craay-zay. But I’ll still be here tomorrow, assuming there is a tomorrow.

  • http://twitter.com/jaexhkim jae kim

    I could not read all of scion. I hated all the religious/god talk, but that’s just personal preference. The goal/stakes/urgency thing is good advice, although I wonder if a good script can be written without stakes or urgency. I’m sure there are examples out there.

    I don’t know what Carson’s going to do for friday. a second amateur script perhaps?

    • carsonreeves1

      You can write a script without urgency for sure. It’s hard, but it can be done (When Harry Met Sally had zero urgency. American Beauty as well). Making a screenplay work without stakes is hard though. If there’s no significance to what the characters are trying to accomplish, the audience usually tunes out. Of course, different writers have different opinions on how high the stakes should be, as do audiences, which is why sometimes two people can walk out of the same movie, one saying they didn’t care about anything and the other saying they were riveted.

      • Scotty

        For me, what I was trying to convey, was Caleb’s goal, using Wizard of Oz, was to get back to Kansas (just being a chicken farmer). I thought keeping it very simple, for this very simple young man would work. With Levi intruding on Caleb’s life, pushing him further and further from the life Caleb wanted. Guess not enough?

  • Malibo Jackk

    Hey Scott
    Welcome to screenwriting hell.
    Curious to know how much of your life spent on the script. How many scripts you’ve written. And if you outlined.

    Don’t let them get you down.
    Raise some dead, my man.

  • The Mulberry Tree

    I’ll start off to say, I enjoyed this script. I don’t think I would pay to see this in theaters but still enjoyable.

    I was able to understand their concept with the tattoo and their whole hereditary healing(not that I thought it needed to be that complex, but I understood it). My biggest issue was when the CIA joined the mix. It just didn’t blend. I felt like William Goldman with “Good Will Hunting”; I kept saying to myself, take out the CIA, concentrate fully on these characters.

    You’re right Carson, the dialogue never threw me out of the story’s element, and compared to some of the other Amateur Friday runner ups(Aquaman), it just felt real and right.

    Maybe it’s just me, but was the only character that arc’d really Rebecca? Every other character seemed to end the way they started which kind of made me mad/sad. Again, maybe it’s just me.

    I think your issue with the Super Bowl aspect was their way of changing the dynamic(that mid point shift); Levi’s no longer trying to swindle small town farmers out of their money, he’s made it to the big show. Caleb is no longer just a chicken farmer, he has options.

    Like I said, I enjoyed reading this story, but I don’t think as a movie it would have held my attention…especially considering it took me 2 and 1/2 days to finish the read. You can tell this writer knows what it takes(I’m sure a lot of us do), but knowing is far easier than doing. Good luck to the writer. I look forward to his future work. Cheers.

  • TGivens

    I liked the script. I just enjoyed reading it. And I think it would work great as a novel. But it needs a lot of work to become a movie. Scotty is a talented writer, he just needs to focus on structure here.

  • Citizen M

    A quick note based on reading the first few pages:

    I wonder if it wouldn’t be better to start with Levi and the fake healing business, then switch to Charlie and Caleb on the farm.

    At the moment, starting with Charlie and Caleb sets a quiet, thoughtful tone. You think the movie will be a sensitive examination of a child with a gift he doesn’t understand the power of, and a father teaching his son how to cope with it. Then it switches tonally to the brash world of hallelujah preaching. I found the contrast jarring because I was mentally unprepared for the loudness and crudeness.

    From the review and the comments so far, the majority of the script is set in a rough-and-tumble world, and you need to forewarn the viewers so they are emotionally braced for it.

  • ElliotMaguire

    With such a strong concept, why veer off so much? Normally that happens with scripts when the main story is boring. A lot of squandered potential here.

    I wanted to see a true battle of will, faith, magic, I wanted the whole script to stay with the child chatacters, but it just kept taking a different route, and it never agreed with me.

    I got lost interest once they crashed into each other when they were older. I stuck with it because Scotty can sure write.

  • Poe_Serling

    It was also adapted into a ’97 film starring Christopher Walken, Bridget Fonda, and Skeet Ulrich (just added his name for fun because it always makes me smile when I hear it).

    The film was written and directed by Paul Schrader.

  • BurntOrangeBoy

    I read about 30 pages of this script awhile back but couldn’t get into it. I didn’t get far enough for Caleb and Levi to meet but I do think that’s a cool direction. One thing that bugged me though was Levi’s preaching. He’s seven years old yet he sounds like he’s sixty, talking about the bad road the young people are going down. It just seemed weird for a seven year old to be talking about sexual sin and other topics that he is way to young to understand, let alone have anything to say about it, no matter how gifted he is.

  • Ambrose*

    I know yesterday was the discussion of ‘The Hobbit’ but I just saw this today, regarding 48fps.

    http://www.vulture.com/2012/12/ask-an-expert-will-we-ever-get-used-to-the-hobbit-48fps-higher-frame-rate.html

    • Poe_Serling

      Great article.

  • CastorTroy16

    I haven’t read the script, only the review but wanted to offer one note that might help Scotty with the revision. If Caleb’s gift is to raise the dead, why not start with the mother? It could be a creepy moment to have the father to cradle the son and the mother. When the son touches her, she comes back to life and spooks the father. Then, you could have the effects of the dead play out more personally through his mother’s actions.

    If you want to add some urgency, make it so that Caleb could only resurrect bodies that are still warm. Once the stiff is on ice, it’s a done deal.

    Just something to consider. Good luck with the revisions.

  • http://twitter.com/4450dawson Mike.H

    I pictured Scotty Davis as some 23 year old thin hunk who wore AB&Fitch sized S Tee’s, but…oh… a mustached old fart who owns a lap top. ( kidding!). Keep Writing! Trust your passion, Scotty! :) Merry X’mas.

    • Scotty

      No, no. I am a 23 year old “hipster”. You must have me confused with someone else?

  • ripleyy

    Screenwriting is so difficult sometimes – and confusing – that I wonder why people – like us – put ourselves through this torture just to get a good story put out there.

    I’m gonna give this a read later but from what I’ve read, it sounds good :) Thanks Scotty for putting yourself out there.

    • carsonreeves1

      telling a great story in 110 pages of this bastardized format known as screenwriting is one of the hardest things to do out there!

      • ripleyy

        Yet there’s something addicting about wanting to keep cracking that secret formula. :)

        • carsonreeves1

          I totally agree. It’s addictive.

  • Colenicks83

    Scotty,

    I bough the 7 old preacher because I saw a news story on one. Those kids are scary. I thought it was cool.

    I agree with the point about there meeting being coincidence and the page count.

    But keep up the good work.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=756479198 Christopher Pendergraft

      One of the churches I visited as a child had a ten-year-old preacher. She was pretty creepy — holding all kinds of exorcisms and stuff like that. I can’t complain. The craziness helped me get through Sunday service. I’m giving this one a shot.

  • Poe_Serling

    Hey Scotty-

    Awesome choice of Marjoe Gortner as Levi’s inspiraton. Gortner’s childhood and early life experiences provide an eye-opening glimpse into the world of tent revivals and televangelism.
    A film worth checking out (which you probably already have seen or know about):
    The ’72 documentary Marjoe from filmmakers Howard Smith and Sarah Kernochan. It captured the Oscar for Best Documentary Feature.

    • carsonreeves1

      Man, how do you know all this stuff, Poe??

      • Poe_Serling

        Long, long hours in my archives. ;-)))

    • Scotty

      Yes Poe, I watched it numerous times. Growing up in the bible belt, I’ve personally witnessed these revivals and revival preachers literally foaming at the mouth. The Marjoe documentary is an excellent “inside look” at that world.

  • Bertie Wooster

    The beginning was very good, easily the best part of the script. It was dramatic and exciting, and I was drawn in.

    The biggest problem is that Levi is far more interesting than the ostensible protagonist, Caleb. The reason why Levi is so much more interesting than Caleb is that he has goals and is willing to take action to achieve them. For example, I loved that Levi was willing to electrocute himself (and rely on Caleb to resurrect him) in order to reestablish himself as an evangelist. If a character is willing to commit suicide to get what he wants, then I have no doubt that he’ll do whatever it takes–and that’s what makes a strong character. Compared to Levi, Caleb doesn’t have a compelling goal for most of the story, and he’s much less interesting as a result. I agree with the suggestions by others that Levi would make a more compelling protagonist.

    Finally, I hated Edward showing up near the end. He basically comes out of nowhere instead of being part of the story from the beginning, and it feels very forced.

  • rl1800

    Read the first twenty or so and then my interest started to wane. As some have already mentioned, it just seemed like there wasn’t enough conflict among the characters due to some of the story choices you made. When Caleb was born, I assumed his powers came from the lightning strike. But, when we find out his father also has the power, I was wondering what the whole point of that scene actually was. I think there would be much more conflict if the father was a hardcore bible thumper who looked at his son’s power as some sort of abomination, and he teaches Caleb to hide it, to be ashamed of it. Then when Caleb is forced to use it, maybe he does it in a public place and the media descends on him. I also thought Caleb’s mastery of his power came way too easily. One day he’s just resurrecting chickens. Think you missed an opportunity for a great dramatic moment when Caleb first sees a hint of his power. Maybe his dog has just been hit by a car or something and he’s crying over it and starts to stroke it and then…well, stuff happens. Make him earn that power.

    One flick you might wanna check out is this old tv movie called Resurrection, starring Ellen Burstyn. In that movie, she’s in a near death experience, then brings her power with her back from beyond. But there’s all sorts of conflict because she doesn’t know what this power is, the public is at first scared of it and the scientific community sets out to prove her as a fraud.

    But I think Scion is off to a good start. As far as paring down the pages, do you really need the child evangelist? I think the focus should remain squarely on Caleb as he develops and deals with his power over the years.

    • carsonreeves1

      I agree. The dad shouldn’t have the power and should be ashamed of his child for being an abomination. Talk about some intense scenes you could write for these two.

  • Roscoe

    With the Black List question out of the way, is 300 Years review up soon? The script has been freely available on the internet so probably more people have read it now.

  • Scotty

    One more thing. On the twins and passing down through generations. The power to raise the dead could only be used on someone who died from “un-natural” causes. If he brought back someone that died because of natural causes, that was “messing with God’s plan”. Hence he couldn’t bring back the grandpa in the wreck. Again, the clarity issue.

  • The_One_Who_KNOCKS

    Is it just me or have there been a lot of crappy scripts flowing in lately. I haven’t even read any for like the past two weeks because all their reviews have been lackluster. That and I’m thoroughly resigned to A Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones and Breaking Bad right about now. The best books and the best shows REALLY get the creative juices flowing. I find myself sitting there thinking “Wow, Vince would’ve totally nailed that scene in MAGNIFICENT fashion” or “David’s dialogue would’ve totally made me care about that character a lot more in one minute than I have yet to do over the course of 20 pages. Speaking of which, I wonder what Daenerys is up to? I should go find out…” Its gotten to the point where now I can’t even make it past the first
    ten pages of a script without diving back into Clash of Kings or BrBa. Then again I can’t really do much of anything without running back to those two… Speaking of which…….

    • carsonreeves1

      What’s “A Song Of Ice And Fire?” Is that a show or a season of Game Of Thrones?

      • rl1800

        It’s the series of novels that Game of Thrones is based on.

  • Scotty Davis

    After thought, I’m beginning to warm to the suggestion Carson made about the “farm debt”. Fleshed out a bit, it could very well provide Caleb with an “internal conflict/struggle”. Yeah, cut out some “poetry”. Confession: I sent Carson the wrong draft. Not much different in content, but the latest was cut to 123 pages. Not a lot, I know, but still “cutting the baby” a bit. I discovered “my bad” a couple of days ago, but Carson announced he was going to review SCION, so I said, WTF….he’s probably already read or is reading it, so let him have at it (and have at it he did ;) ;) So, thanks to all for the honest feedback. I shall return. (was gonna say “I’ll be bak”, but I just watched Expendables 2 and couldn’t believe they punched that in there).

  • Scotty Davis

    “-It probably should have been mentioned earlier than page 83 that Caleb can only heal those who didn’t die of natural causes.”

    I guess the clarity aspect didn’t come through. Instead of coming right out early and saying Caleb couldn’t raise anyone from the dead that died of natural causes, I showed a couple of example, i.e. Charlie’s heart attack, and the grandfather and Levi in the car crash. What’s the hiccup with Caleb’s ability? I was in hope the audience/reader would ask the question in their mind, why couldn’t he bring those two back? What do those two have in common? The little girl and Levi were killed as a direct result of the car crash, but not the grandfather. So, I need to make it more clear somehow without just blurting out early that specific aspect… or do I?

    • JaredW

      Hi Scotty, I think you do need to make it clearer that natural causes prevents Caleb from resurrecting people. But then again, maybe it was just me that I didn’t put the pieces together when you showed the clues. If I didn’t pick up on it, then there’s a chance a potential audience wouldn’t pick up on it either. So making it clear early on would be beneficial, in my opinion.

      • Scotty

        Jared, I agree. Just how to make it more clear without Caleb or someone verbalizing it. Having the audience come to that realization through a visual is more compelling than having someone just blurt it out…imho. That’s the key.

  • Scotty Davis

    On Carson’s question of the character’s age. In the first act, both are little school aged boys. When Caleb is in the boy’s home, Kenny states there’s only two ways out… be adopted or turn 21. A few scenes later, we see Caleb in Snipes office. It’s his birthday, he’s being released so I assumed (yeah, I know) that the audience/reader would realize Caleb has just turned 21. Please don’t take my responses wrong. I’m not declaring “you dummies just don’t get it”. I’m trying to figure out how, what I wrote, didn’t come through with the “clarity” that was in my noodle. I guess it’s that fine line between “show don’t tell”.

Archives
  • 2013 (139)
  • 2012 (277)
  • 2011 (291)
  • 2010 (324)
  • 2009 (350)