It’s Tuesday which means it’s time for another horror review. Another horror review that I won’t be giving. But I’ve left you in good hands. Jonny Atlas knows his shit. As he points out in his review, he’s a Rules Nazi, and I’ve been the recipient of some of his analysis before. It’s not pretty. But while he can be harsh, he always has good advice. Here is his review of Parasite.

Genre: Horror
Premise: When the crew of an underwater research station discovers a new parasite that turns its host homicidal they have to defend themselves against the surrounding sea life and their infected crew mates in order to stay alive.
About: This horror script was making the rounds not long ago and got some pretty good heat. Ultimately, it failed to sell. It’s good to read these “almost” sales every once in awhile so you can study what separates a sale from a non-sale. Kristy sold. This did not. Why?
Writer: Ehud Lavski

When Carson asked me to review this script, I asked him what it was about. He responded, “I don’t know but Tarson says it’s good. I think you should read it.” A fine endorsement if ever I’ve heard one. I found the logline on trackingb, and I have to say the premise really intrigued me. It’s a fresh take on the late 80s/early 90s underwater thriller formula.

The script opens on plankton, which get eaten by a striped bass in a fisherman’s trap. Halfway through the first page we meet our antagonistic force: THE PARASITE! Our gluttonous bass chomps down on the parasite and spits it back out. Too bad the parasite has other plans. It uses it’s tentacles to force-feed itself to the bass. We then see the other fish in the trap huddled in the far corner, “crazed with fear”.

I like scripts that open with a bang. This certainly opened with a pop, but I don’t know that I really felt a bang. The sequence was creepy and the parasite was pretty damn cool, but it ends too soon. We don’t get to see what the parasite does, other than force fish to eat it. In my opinion, this is a huge wasted opportunity on Lavski’s part. He says it’s “the parasite”, but I was hoping to see this thing as bad news straight out of the box. I wanted Lavski to give me something I should be afraid of. He let me down.

From there, the script turns to shit for a good 24 pages.

Let me rephrase that. It turns into a shitty horror script for the next 24 pages. The stuff that happens on pages 2 through 25 isn’t drek. In fact, it’s pretty well written. Unfortunately it doesn’t belong in a horror script. Lavski gives us 24 pages of pure character development. I shit you not. There is only one mention of the impending parasite threat on page 6, where a herring beats another fish to death by repeatedly swimming into it. After that, nothing until page 26.

We meet Jane and Doc. Jane’s cramped in a small exploration sub, and Doc is her connection to the underwater station. They do their job, with a chunks of exposition thrown in for good measure. Their first interaction is a great example:

[scrippet]
Doc wears a pair of HEADPHONES. She stares at a beat-up family photo. Doc hugging her husband and kids.

JANE (O.S.)
(Coming from headphones)
Staring at the picture again?

Doc laughs, busted.

INTERCUT JANE/DOC

DOC
How could you tell?

JANE
I can hear you ovulating from down here.

DOC
You holding up OK?

JANE
Ask me when I’m out of the coffin.

DOC
Claustrophobia’s acting up?

JANE
What do you think?

DOC
From one to ten?

JANE
Beansprout.
[/scrippet]
Reading this, I felt like I was getting beat over the head with the information hammer. It’s written with skill (“I can hear you ovulating from down here”), but it is one massive exposition dump. Doc has a family, wants more kids, been away for a long time. Doc and Jane are good friends. Jane has claustrophobia. Bla bla bla.

I’m sure some would argue that it’s a good use of a few lines of dialog and action to dump info on the reader. If it were really that good Lavski could spare us the next two pages. You see, Jane has Doc sing her a lullaby as she collects samples in her tiny sub for two fucking pages.

Is Jane’s proficiency with the mechanical arm on the sub important to the plot? Yes. Do we need two pages to establish it? Fuck no.

Right here, I already had a few huge problems.

Problem 1: Why the fuck would a claustrophobic person (whose claustrophobia is a pretty big plot point) sign up to work in an UNDERWATER RESEARCH FACILITY? More importantly, why the fuck would they agree to get in a miniature submarine with “barely enough space to move”? Sorry, I don’t buy it.

Problem 2: Why have some random “infected” fish attack another random fish on page 6, when you could have the striped bass from page 1 attack the other fish at the bottom of page 1? Seriously, it’s a waste of an opportunity. More importantly, there’s a huge disconnect because we never see random fish #2 get infected. We have to draw the conclusion on our own. Why risk the chance of losing your audience?

Anyway, after the shit with the fish, this guy Curtis persuades Doc to let him talk to Jane “alone”. We get the vibe he and Jane had a thing before he screwed it up somehow. Doc agrees and leaves the room, which leaves psycho-ass Curtis free to try and kill Jane. Why? Because he and Jane were dating until Jane started fucking the Captain.

You read that right. Jane’s best friend on the ship just left the guy Jane fucked over (who is apparently known for having an anger problem) alone in the room with her sub’s remote controls. That’s two problems in one. A) Doc is either a moron (doubtful since she’s a mom and a fucking DOCTOR) or she doesn’t give a shit about her friend, and B) our claustrophobic protagonist is cramped in a tiny sub when the fucking thing has a remote control station! Seriously, what the fuck?

I’m gonna stop harping on details now because if I don’t I’ll be here all fucking night. Seriously, the minor plot holes and glaring errors regarding science and plausibility made me want to bash my head against a wall. Moving on.

So Curtis tries to kill Jane for eleven pages and the mighty Captain Matt comes to the rescue. Once again, it was well written. There was definitely some suspense here. Really though, eleven pages? So not necessary. Then there’s six pages of aftermath from the attempted murder, which puts the sequence at seventeen pages.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m all about deep characters. However, it is the job of the screenwriter to weave character development into the unraveling of your premise’s plot. Throughout this script (and especially in the first act), Lavski does one or the other. Consequently, the real story doesn’t start until page 26.

On page 26, Doc pulls in the fisherman’s trap from page 1 (like the audience is going to remember that shit after 25 pages of character drama), bringing the parasite onto the ship.
Yeah. The inciting incident doesn’t happen until page 26. But hey, that means we’re gonna get to the good stuff now, right?

Wrong.

More character drama. In fact, there’s eight more pages of characters blabbering until Curtis eats the parasite on page 34. Then they talk for another five pages before more shit starts to happen. I wouldn’t mind the five pages if I hadn’t already read a whopping thirty-two pages of plotless character exposition.

On page 40, crazy shit starts happening. On page 41 we finally make it to the second act when the crew discovers the parasite in a fish. Mind you, it’s in a fish. Curtis is still MIA.
On page 50, they realize Doc has a parasite in her brain. Page 53, someone has their first run-in with parasite-controlled Curtis. It’s not until this point that there’s any palpable suspense from the antagonistic force (the parasite).

You’re probably wondering why I’m harping on page count so much. It’s not because I’m a rule nazi, I promise. Take a look at the script’s logline: “When the crew of an underwater research station discovers a new parasite that turns its host homicidal they have to defend themselves against the surrounding sea life and their infected crew mates in order to stay alive.”

None of that shit starts to happen until page 41. Hell, they don’t even face an infected crewmember until page 53! That’s practically the fucking midpoint.

Basically, you wind up with a script that promises to be like DeepStar Six but starts out like The Abyss (don’t get me wrong – The Abyss is by far a superior film; DeepStar Six is just a more action-packed horror flick). Actually, This script starts out like a tortoise in a marathon. Too bad slow and steady doesn’t win the fucking race. It just puts me to sleep.

Speaking of DeepStar Six, Parasite’s story actually follows its formula pretty fucking rigidly. All the beats are there, down to the slightly crazy crewmember whose personal beef with crewmember X motivates him to kill, which leads to a fistfight between him and crewmember Y. If only this script followed DS6′s lead and put the characters in danger at the beginning of the script instead of the middle…

For the rest of the script, it’s pretty nonstop. There’s a lot of crazy shit – giant crabs, parasite-controlled sharks, kamikaze dolphins… some really cool (and sometimes silly) stuff. There are still a ton of errors in the story (as mentioned earlier), but the second half of the script is a fun ride nonetheless. I really wish the whole script was like the last 61 pages. Unfortunately, that’s not the case.

[ ] trash
[x] barely kept my interest
[ ] worth the read
[ ] impressive
[ ] genius

What I learned: As important as character development is in a script, you must integrate it with your plot. Otherwise you wind up with a schism between character and plot that no amount of flowery prose can mend. Find creative ways to reveal your characters through the action of your forward-moving storyline. If you don’t, your story will get lost in the incessant blabbering of your characters and your first act will be over forty pages.

I also found Parasite to be further evidence that writing eloquently and knowing how to tell a great story do not always come pre-packaged together. If you don’t have both abilities naturally, it takes time and effort to develop the skills necessary to execute a great script. Don’t shortchange yourself by hoping the good will outweigh the bad.

If you want to read more from Jonny, check out his blog here: Jonny Atlas Writes

A final word here. Jonny brings up a great point in his “What I learned” section. Character development is extremely important to your script. But you have to do it on the move. You have to hide it inside actions and sneak it into dialogue. You can’t set apart large chunks of your screenplay just to develop characters or you’re going to put the reader to sleep. Keep the story moving. I saw that this was 114 pages. Most horror scripts are closer to 100 pages because the writer knows they gotta keep the story moving. It sounds like that could’ve helped here.

  • Anonymous

    I read this and thought it was okay. Didn’t mind the character dev as much as you did. But the script picks up in the second half for sure.

  • Ryan (Biohazard)

    I love The Abyss,so needless to say, I was very eager to read this script when I received it a while back. Still haven’t made it past page 30-something. It was boring. The Curtis stuff seemed thrown in to create arbitrary conflict for the sake of conflict. I wanted to see a parasite, god dammit!

  • Anonymous

    Excellent idea to have guest reviewers.

    When will the next interview be?

    Maybe you should try to find some older, retired scriptwriters to interview, who might have a different perspective on the industry. There must be a lot of older industry employees living in Hollywood, folks in their 70′s and 80′s. Not sure how you would find them, but they might have more time to give you.

  • Anonymous

    Do you or any of your readers know of any good scriptwriting schools or classes. I think UCLA extensions has classes but what about one year degree programs?

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/08439555051697115476 Carson Reeves

    I like that idea. Older screenwriter interviews. That’s a really cool idea.

    Hopefully, a week from Saturday, I’ll have my second interview up. Another writer from the Top 10.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/08439555051697115476 Carson Reeves

    Anon, AFI has a great program. Hard to get into though. UCLA and USC are obviously the big dogs. Chapman, down in Orange County, I believe has a good one as well.

    Check out my blogger comrade Scott Myer’s blog over at “Go Into The Story” – http://www.gointothestory.com/. He teaches screenwriting classes over at UCLA. Great person to ask.

    Ryan, I could never get over the scene where they suffocate the mouse underwater. It looked too real to be made up.

  • Anonymous

    I hope it is the writer of “The Brigands of Rattleborge”, a great script!

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/06872780969179149381 martinb

    I quite enjoyed this script. It has good pace and escalating tension. I didn’t mind all the character development, but I agree that showing more of the parasite’s moves and life cycle would be good. Editing could make up for some script deficiencies.

    What sinks the script is the improbabilities. Dolphins battering through the steel hull of an underwater research station? Remote-controlling a submarine without a data cable connection?

    The reason Kristy sold and this not is that Kristy had no factual errors and would be cheap to make, whereas Parasite will need the expense of models and CGI, and risks being laughed off the screen for its errors.

  • http://www.yahoo.com SAM

    nice review Johnny. It was clear throughout, I got the gist of what you didn’t like, and your lesson at the end was clear and made sense.

    Only issue was the paragraph starting “You read that right…” I didn’t know Doc was a chick, so it took a couple reads.

    Fun read, and now I have to go rent the Abyss..

  • http://jonnyatlasinc.com JonnyAtlas

    It’s cool to hear some other opinions on the script. I know my review was harsh, but I hold every script to the same rigorous standards (especially my own).

    I know a few of you mentioned that you didn’t mind all the character development that much. Honestly, on my first read through it only bothered me mildly. That’s the thing – it’s well written, and the stuff is still pretty entertaining (minus the whole lullaby/specimen retrieval sequence).

    Of course, I always read through a script I am reviewing (or giving notes on) at least twice. The second time through Parasite was like crawling through broken glass. The structural flaws (and lack of premise for the first 41 pages) smacked me in the face repeatedly.

    Ryan, your last sentence summed up my feeling for the first half of the script perfectly.

    martinb, I agree completely about the improbabilities. I can’t even count the times I rolled my eyes and said, “really? Come on, that would never fucking happen.”

    Parasite wasn’t the worst script I’ve ever read, it could just use some heavy rewrites.

  • http://jonnyatlasinc.com JonnyAtlas

    Thanks SAM. I’m glad you enjoyed the review. I see what you mean about that paragraph. There are a lot of subjects muddling up the clarity. My bad.

  • Ryan (Biohazard)

    Anon: The best screenwriting class is the internet.

  • Anonymous

    This is the problem I have with every script reader and movie goer today, if there’s no bang-bang action happening right away or if nobody dies by page five the writer is looking at his script getting tossed in the dumpster. Character development is not a concern anymore. Speaking of the Abyss, that movie wouldn’t get made today I’m certain. It’s just too much character development for the fragile minds of readers.

  • Anonymous

    Anon,
    I would imagine if you had written and directed Terminator and Aliens you could make the Abyss today.

  • http://jonnyatlasinc.com JonnyAtlas

    Anon, I think you’re missing the point. The problem with Parasite was not that there was character development, but that the writer didn’t even attempt to work said character development into the plot. Until page 41, he was literally writing two different scripts – the parasite script (which was all of five pages) and the character drama.

    The problem arises because the logline is all about the parasite and the conflict that arises from it. Hell, the script is called Parasite for crying out loud. Yet there is no conflict between characters and the parasite for over 40 pages of the script.

    Great screenwriters understand how to build great characters THROUGH the plot of the story, not outside of it (as is the case in this script). If you read my blog, you’ll notice pretty quickly that I think characters are one of the the most important elements of a script. Over half my posts are dedicated to the subject.

    My negative comments in the review have nothing to do with “no bang-bang action” and everything to do with lazy writing.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/08439555051697115476 Carson Reeves

    Yeah, it’s not so much that you need to open the script with guns blazing. You just need to hook the reader. And keep him hooked. Weave in a mystery. Weave in some intrigue. If what you’re writing is interesting enough, the reader will stay with you.

    But if you just have a bunch of people sitting around talking for the sake of us “getting to know them” for extended periods of time, you’re gonna lose the reader.

    Let me reiterate that I haven’t read this script. But I see this a lot in amateur screenplays.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/06872780969179149381 martinb

    Jonny, there might be no conflict between the character and the parasite for 40 pages, but one of the characters was out there at risk in the parasite’s environment. So there was suspense. I kept expecting the parasite to strike Jane in the sub, which kept my interest until the slam-bang action began.

  • http://jonnyatlasinc.com JonnyAtlas

    You make a good point, martinb. The sub sequence was pretty conflict-heavy. The first time I read through the script, the sequence definitely had me interested.

    Like you said though, there was an expectation of the parasite that wasn’t paid off for a very long time. I did admit there was some suspense in that sequence. It as one of the most well-written scenes of the entire script.

    Here’s the thing, though. How much better would the script be if Lavski showed the striped bass kill the other fish on page 1 and had the fisherman’s trap pulled in on page 5 instead of the lullaby sequence (or even spliced in with it, if he so desired)? By page 5 the parasite would be on the ship. He could have someone other than Doc cooking up the fish while the whole thing with Curtis and Jane is going on. Then, right after Matt kicks Curtis’s ass, Curtis eats the parasite.

    Follow that up with the “tons of fish in the moon pool hall” scene and Lavski would have one seriously killer first act without sacrificing ANY character development. Not to mention the script would be fulfilling the promise of the premise and keeping the core of the story as a central element of the script (rather than throwing it on the back burner for 30+ pages).

    I honestly chock the first 40 pages of the script up to lazy writing. I feel like this script needed loving attention in the rewrite process that it hasn’t received yet. There’s no excuse for the stuff that should be on page 5 to be on page 25.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/06872780969179149381 martinb

    My last comment: if I were a producer I’d seriously consider buying this script. Having thought about it for a bit, I believe that it wouldn’t be difficult to fix the technical stuff and the story structure, and be left with a really interesting, tense SF thriller.

    Thinking as a wannabe screenwriter, the lesson I take from this is: get someone you trust to check out your script and give you feedback, then fix the obvious problems — don’t send it out prematurely.

  • http://jonnyatlasinc.com JonnyAtlas

    I agree 100%, martinb. Having a network of fellow writers to exchange notes with is invaluable. I also agree that a solid rewrite could make this a great script.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/07019706620588684967 Trailer Trashers

    Amen Jonny

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/10848993393671776226 Seslimeydan

    Thank you for the information your provide. sesli chat Sohbette kalite
    SesliSohbet Seslide kalite Sesli Sohbet Sende gel dunyamiza Sesli Chat KatilSesli Chat siteleriBizi mutlu edersin.sesliAlemSesli SohbetburdaSesli ChatSesli sohbetteSesli SohbetSeNSesli ChatGelSesli SohbetAramizaSesli ChatkatilSesli SohbetbizimleSesli Chat en güzelini Sesli Sohbet yasayacaksın Sesli Chat Hadi Sesli SohbetbekliyorumSesli ChatSeniSesli sohbet siteleriArkadasliklarSesli şehir burda
    Seslişehir kurulur avsa avsa Sende SesliChatgel
    SesliSohbetarkadasiniSeslisohbet siteleribulSesliChat sitelerigelecen misesli chatthansk admin.
    SesliChat sitesi gel yanimizaSesli Chat sitesi bekliyorum.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/10020645854195822060 FeNaaa
  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/08335024823049444267 xx
  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/07799960912577177053 Baranjik
  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/17484435113261857575 thanks for sharing

    Thanks for sharring importent information in this blog.
    It was very nice.
    Ask Flashlari
    ask

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/18441007530451863230 ilizyonist

    Türkiye’de yaşayan travesti veya trv kısaltması olarakta kullanılan üçüncü cinsin temsilcilerini daha yakından tanımak isteyen ziyaretçilere travesti siteleri‘ni tanıtmak istiyorum. Travestiler;mersin travestileri, antalya travestileri, bursa travestileri, istanbul travestileri, ankara travestileri olarak kategorilere ayrılmış sitelerimizde özellikle ülkemizin en yoğun şehriistanbul travestileri, travesti yaşamının büyük bir bölümünü oluşturuyor. Travesti karşı cinsin özelliklerini tam anlamıyla taşımasada kendini öyle hisseden, karşı cins gibi giyinip hareket eden ameliyat olmamış kişidir. Travesti arkadaşlarla tanışmak isteyenleri yukarıda verdiğim kategorilere göre arayabilirsiniz. Üklemizde de diğer avrupa ülkelerinde olduğu gibi vip travesti hizmeti veren ve vip travesti özelliklerine sahip olan birçok travesti bulmak mümkün.Escort bayan gibi escort travesti hizmeti sunan birçok travesti‘ye rastlayabilirsiniz. Farklı sitelerdeki travesti vip sitelerini verdiğim adreslerde rahatlıkla bulabilir, travesti resimleri‘ni profillerini inceleyebilirsiniz.travesti

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/03679550200753521689 hakan
Archives
  • 2013 (116)
  • 2012 (277)
  • 2011 (291)
  • 2010 (324)
  • 2009 (351)