Genre: Horror/Thriller
Premise: A fly fisherman lures his victims in with bait and guts them like fish.
About: Nicholl Fellowship winner 2007.
Writer: Michael L. Hare


This is going to cause some of you to have an orgasm. Seriously. If I had to describe this script, it would be a cross between The Strangers and Donnie Darko, two movies I’m not very fond of, but am sure a lot of you are. For the record, I watched Donnie Darko a second time a few years ago at an obscure boring party. I sat down and watched the entire thing to the sounds of ambient music and party noise. I realized how taken I was with it just from a visual perspective. The photography in that film is freaking awesome. It’s when people start talking or the odd musical choices kick in that it all falls apart (for me at least).

Anyway, The Fly Fisher is like the unofficial non-sci-fi sequel to Donnie Darko. It’s a story about a seriously fucked up Fly Fisherman who lures his victims in, does God knows what to them in his stream-side abode, then guts them like a fish.

After he mutilates a sweet little skater chick in the opening scene, we’re introduced to our hero, Jack. Jack is a bit of a high school nerd. He’s into theater. Plays chess. Not exactly hanging in the VIP section. Jack’s got a bit of a strained relationship with his father, Frank, who’s been favoring work over family time lately, and is upset when his dad can’t come to a chess tournament. His mom, Chris, takes him instead and after a 45 minute drive to the location, they find themselves lost in the middle of Swampland USA. How could this have happened, they ask? They followed the GPS.

Ooh, I might know. He LURED YOU HERE YOU IDIOTS! He used some sort of fish oil or something to hack your GPS. God you guys are stupid.

A grimy muddy old station wagon pulls up – always a positive and fruitful sign. But Jack and Chris shrug their shoulders and hop in when The Fly Fisherman (who likes to whistle) offers them a ride. When the Fly Fisherman tries to drive his catch back to the grill though, Chris and Jack fight back and escape, able to swim deep into the river to safety. Later, Frank laments the fact that he wasn’t there for them, and mentally promises to spend more time with his son. But it ain’t going to happen because that night The Fly Fisherman actually BREAKS INTO their house and kidnaps Jack!

Crying ensues.

Two years pass. Not a word. Not a peep. Frank and Chris assume the worst. Their son is dead. But then the cops get a call and the news comes back that they’ve found Jack! He’s alive! Yaaaayyyy!

Or is it yay?

……

This time, Frank’s going to make damn sure that he spends some time with his son. As the family tries to get back to a normal life, the secret of what happened to Jack over those two years hangs over them. His parents ask. But Jack doesn’t talk much anymore. He doesn’t do much of anything anymore. He seems detached. Tortured. Is there something else going on here?

You bet your ass there is! The Fly Fisher has programmed Jack to kill his father is what happened ! He even shows up at night in the yard calling to Jack: “Do it” he says. “Do it.” The Fly Fisher has convinced poor Jack that his father is evil for ignoring him and that the only solution is to kill him. Will the Fly Fisher win? Will Jack kill his father? Or will Jack break free of the Fly Fisher’s fish-like mind control over him? That’s the question.

Hmmm, where do I begin? I’ll give The Fly Fisher this. It keeps you guessing. Pretty much ignoring the 3-Act structure, the first 60 pages took so many detours, I had no idea if or when we were ever going to get back on the main road. I don’t even know if there was a main road to begin with because the focus of this takes awhile to become clear. We experience an unrelated murder. We then experience Jack and his Mom seemingly getting kidnapped. But they escape. We then see Jack kidnapped out of his own house. And then we see a “Two years later” title, where Jack is found and rejoins his parents. After all this happens, we still don’t know what the story is about. Needless to say, I was a little frustrated.

But the script is funky and different (like Darko and Strangers) and I have a feeling people will respond to that. It’s just that I, personally, prefer a strong narrative over a string of weird occurrences, as is the nature of The Fly Fisher. It does eventually get to the story (Will Jack kill his father?) but I had a hard time hopping in the boat on that one. Jack’s been brainwashed to think his father is a terrible person because of the way he’s treated Jack. And the movie becomes this emotional journey where Jack is trying to come to terms with whether his father cares about him or not. The problem is, from everything we know, Frank has just been busy at work . In every other respect, he’s a loving caring dad. So he hasn’t shown up to a few chess tournaments recently? That’s grounds for murder? I don’t know. I had a hard time buying it.

I was also curious why the detectives, who knew that The Fly Fisher’s previous victim attempted to kill his father under the same conditions, didn’t warn Frank about it. They were in constant contact. It seems like a piece of information you would want to hear – “Oh, by the way Frank, your son might try to kill you in your sleep.”

But the script has its admirers and the person who suggested it has solid taste so who knows? You might love it. If you do, please contribute your thoughts in the comments section. I’d like to know what I missed here.

[ ] trash
[x] barely kept my interest
[ ] worth the read
[ ] impressive
[ ] genius

What I learned: The Fly Fisher has an intense first 10 pages and that got me thinking about the ubiquitous screenwriting rule: “Make Your First 10 Pages Great”. While I believe in the first ten pages rule in principle, it’s kind of a crock of shit. On the one hand, you want to grab the reader’s attention right away. And that’s definitely important. But just in case you forgot, uh, THERE’S STILL ANOTHER 100 PAGES OF STORY LEFT TO TELL! It’s kind of like talking to women who are obsessed with their wedding. Who have been dreaming their entire lives about this one moment that’s going to be the most perfect day in their entire lives and if they can just have the perfect day then there’s nothing else they need…you want to say to them: “You know there’s 50 years of marriage after this, right?” Same deal here folks. It doesn’t matter if your first ten pages are bang-up awesome if the rest of the script sucks. I’ve actually seen a lot of this, where the writer clearly focuses only on the first ten pages – making them the best ten pages I’ve ever read….. and then page 11 sucks balls. So make your first ten pages great. But make the rest of them great as well. No one’s giving you a 3-picture deal for ten pages.

  • Anonymous

    Let me guess. His father only bought him a karaoke machine while the Fly Fisherman bought him a horse. Please tell me the father has a special set of skills.

  • yeebarr

    Great review Carson! I was laughing so hard I'm almost tempted to read the script just to see how bad "page 11" sucks! :)

  • Julian

    I wondered if you were making this up, sure sounds nutty. Will take a look at the script.

  • PJ

    The link to this script isn't working for me…

  • Anonymous

    For the record, Donnie Darko rocks your face off.

    But this script does not appeal to me at all.

  • Josh Floyd

    Donnie Darko is great.

    The Strangers was terrible. How can I take any film seriously when every character is a complete idiot?

  • Anonymous

    JJ Says:

    I got a copy of this about a month ago, tried reading it, and I kept thinking, "Is this a comedy? Am I just not getting the joke here? No…it's really about an evil…like, SAW goes fishing, or something…" I'm really surprised to hear this is a Nichols Fellowship winner.

    Also, Carson, I gotta admit: I admire your critical capacities, I really do, but I don't get the Donnie Darko comparison.

    Great point about the page 11 fall off, though. I've noticed that a lot too.

  • Überpossum

    If Spinal Tap wrote a script it would be good up to page 11.

  • Anonymous

    I think the prose in the script was really well done and engaging. However, if it were translated to screen, it would be just another horror film. I hate to think how many readers and judges are seduced by overly embellished prose, when even the most poetic description of a standard shot is still a standard shot.

  • Carson Reeves

    It's a weird script, no doubt. I'm very surprised it won the Fellowship.

    JJ, the Darko reference is because of this tortured young man who is continually visited by a mysterious force who's trying get him to do something. It felt very similar in that sense. Of course, it would've been more similar had the fly fisherman been dressed up as a bunny.

  • Anonymous

    "Of course, it would've been more similar had the fly fisherman been dressed up as a bunny."

    Now that's a script I would have read.

  • Kevan R. Craft

    I'm surprised this script won the Fellowship myself – damn! Written with Microsoft Word as well..

    I must enter that Fellowship competition next time myself.. Damn!

    Damn! Damn! And blast!

  • martinb

    I've never been a horror fan and this script didn't turn me into one.

    Several people have praised the writing. While it's good, I thought it overly macho, more suited to an action script. To me, the essence of horror is bad things happen to ordinary people like you and me, and we must find extraordinary courage within ourselves to escape. But this family speak like foul-mouthed tough guys and treat their 13-yr-old son as an equal.

    As Carson points out, Jack's father isn't particularly bad. What we need to see is *the monster* observing Jack's father and deciding he is so bad that Jack needs to escape from his clutches forever, thus motivating his (the monster's) actions.

    Speaking of motivation, why were teenage girls lured in and gutted? That was never explained. It's just some sado porn to boost the ratings, apparently.

    I thought the ending was quite clever. I didn't see it coming. It wrapped things up neatly enough. (But the final, final ending I didn't understand.)

    A couple of points: Jack's dad calls him Champ, his mom calls him Kiddo, the detective calls him Bro, the detective calls his dad Dad, not Mr Jacobs or Sir. Is this common in America? (I'm not American, obviously.)

    And I prefer dream sequences to be indicated DREAM SEQUENCE in the scene headings.

    All in all, I think this is one for the genre aficionados only.

  • Anonymous

    JJ says:

    "Is this common in America?"

    Only in bad dialouge. I've never heard a policeman refer to someone as "Dad"…"Well, Dad, after he pulled the gun you said what? Oh, happy Father's Day, by the way."

    That's SO weird that I'm wondering if the writer isn't doing it on purpose–no one calls him his real name because he's lost his identity, or something.

  • Anonymous

    Carson: your comments on the first ten pages rule got me thinking – a lot of scripts DO have great, fantastic, openings only to drop in quality as the story progresses. In fact, "Conviction" was just such a script. The first few pages of that sucker were top notch. After that, though…

  • Alex C.

    I read this when Phoenix Pics was considering making back in 2007. Really liked it but don't know if script's changed since Circle of Confusion attached.

    Anyway, liked this version for exactly the reasons stated as dinks above – in a world of so much you-guessed-it horror, new ideas are unusual. And appreciated.

    Anyone know current status? Writer's contact info?

  • darrylyo

    Alex, Circle of Confusion reps Hare. Last I heard CoC is not attached.

    No secret that I love FF. Said elsewhere this is easily one of the ten best horrors to circ in past few years. In town, really thought of as a throwback to 70s sensibility and style, when every beat, jump and scare wasn't derivative and telegraphed. Lots of heavy hitter fans for this one, and deservedly so I think.

    Interesting side note – just read another script by Hare called "Feud." Jacob Aaron Estes, writer and director of "The Details" is apparently attached to produce with Cherry Road. Don't like this one quite as much as FF, but again, a very original, visceral kind of piece.

    Anyway, don't think I've seen two Nicholl winners team up before. Should be interesting.

    -d

  • DeafEars

    I don't have too much to add to the conversation, I agree with Carson that the writer was flailing in terms of story. I wasn't a huge fan of THE STRANGERS, but one thing I will give it is it sure didn't lose focus, it was single-minded to a fault. THE FLY FISHER has an interesting concept that tries to service two genres, the "serial killer with a gimmick" genre and the "disturbed and probably homicidal kid" genre. Unfortunately the line between a provocative hybrid and a story without focus can be a thin one and IMO FLY FISHER crossed it repeatedly.

    Actually in terms of its problems it reminded me of MEN WHO STARE AT GOATS. The writing was slick enough to almost disguise the problem, that the story fell between two stools. But I finally lost my patience when the dog got killed. Not only is it cliched, when I see a scene like this on pg. 84 or whatever, after we've had teenagers getting gutted in the first 20 pages, it means that the stakes have been fatally de-escalated and the momentum slowed down right where it should be building like crazy. So, interesting concept, shoddy execution, gets a "barely kept my interest" although it was head and shoulders above THE UMBRA which got the same rank from me.

  • Jim Endecott

    The whole Mom, Dad, bro thing had me confused as well.

    Also I think naming characters is key to a script. Visually you can tell characters apart. On paper you have to set them apart.

    Naming the Mom "Chris" took me a bit of getting used to. I kept mixing up Frank and Jack as well. The writer also uses different names for the dective as well. Silva, Det. Silve etc.

    I know its small and petty but stuff like that takes me out of the story.

    -Jim

  • Seslimeydan

    Thank you for the information your provide. sesli chat Sohbette kalite
    SesliSohbet Seslide kalite Sesli Sohbet Sende gel dunyamiza Sesli Chat KatilSesli Chat siteleriBizi mutlu edersin.sesliAlemSesli SohbetburdaSesli ChatSesli sohbetteSesli SohbetSeNSesli ChatGelSesli SohbetAramizaSesli ChatkatilSesli SohbetbizimleSesli Chat en güzelini Sesli Sohbet yasayacaksın Sesli Chat Hadi Sesli SohbetbekliyorumSesli ChatSeniSesli sohbet siteleriArkadasliklarSesli şehir burda
    Seslişehir kurulur avsa avsa Sende SesliChatgel
    SesliSohbetarkadasiniSeslisohbet siteleribulSesliChat sitelerigelecen misesli chatthansk admin.
    SesliChat sitesi gel yanimizaSesli Chat sitesi bekliyorum.

  • FeNaaa
  • travesti
  • xx
  • ircscorpion
  • Baranjik
  • kenaN_
  • eskort
  • ilizyonist

    Türkiye'de yaşayan travesti veya trv kısaltması olarakta kullanılan üçüncü cinsin temsilcilerini daha yakından tanımak isteyen ziyaretçilere travesti siteleri'ni tanıtmak istiyorum. Travestiler;mersin travestileri, antalya travestileri, bursa travestileri, istanbul travestileri, ankara travestileri olarak kategorilere ayrılmış sitelerimizde özellikle ülkemizin en yoğun şehriistanbul travestileri, travesti yaşamının büyük bir bölümünü oluşturuyor. Travesti karşı cinsin özelliklerini tam anlamıyla taşımasada kendini öyle hisseden, karşı cins gibi giyinip hareket eden ameliyat olmamış kişidir. Travesti arkadaşlarla tanışmak isteyenleri yukarıda verdiğim kategorilere göre arayabilirsiniz. Üklemizde de diğer avrupa ülkelerinde olduğu gibi vip travesti hizmeti veren ve vip travesti özelliklerine sahip olan birçok travesti bulmak mümkün.Escort bayan gibi escort travesti hizmeti sunan birçok travesti'ye rastlayabilirsiniz. Farklı sitelerdeki travesti vip sitelerini verdiğim adreslerde rahatlıkla bulabilir, travesti resimleri'ni profillerini inceleyebilirsiniz.travesti'

  • abcweightloss

    Interesting article, Thanks!

  • hakan
Archives
  • 2013 (117)
  • 2012 (277)
  • 2011 (291)
  • 2010 (324)
  • 2009 (351)