Hello everyone. I wasn’t going to post anything this week but after watching Wonder Woman 1984, I couldn’t help myself. By the way, this is a stream-of-consciousness post, so I’m sorry in advance if it’s as nonsensical as the movie I just saw. Wonder Woman 1984 is one of the worst superhero movies I’ve ever watched. In fact, it’s so bad that I can’t think of any superhero movie that’s worse at the moment. Literally, the first 70 minutes of the movie is setup. We’re talking blatant 100% exposition setup. Diane meets Steve again. Some geeky girl finds a wish machine. Some oil magnate goes looking for the wish machine. For some reason, we go to Saudi Arabia on an invisible plane. Saudi Arabia then has a wall around it. I mean this was comically awful screenwriting. And you don’t get the excuses anymore. Marvel has solid scripts for all its superhero movies, which is why they all get near 90% RT scores. But this? It was as if not a single person challenged Patty Jenkins on how bad the screenplay she was writing was.
And that’s why I’m posting this article. Patty Jenkins is responsible for the next Star Wars movie. About X-Wing fighters or something. Why is Patty Jenkins responsible for the next Star Wars movie? Was there a single Star Wars fan in the universe who said, “I hope they get Patty Jenkins to direct a Star Wars movie.” No. Not one. So why was she chosen to not only direct a Star Wars movie but shepherd the next wave of Star Wars feature films for Disney? Maybe they really liked her pitch? Maybe it was for another reason. The only one who knows for sure is the person who’s slowly sucking the life out of Star Wars with every decision she’s made, Kathleen Kennedy. But, surely, after seeing Wonder Woman 1984, you have to kill this Patty Jenkins Star Wars project, right? There’s still plenty of time to do so. And Kennedy has fired people way further into the process. If her number one priority is making a quality Star Wars film, she has to fire Jenkins. If her priority is something else, she’ll keep Jenkins on. She better make the right decision because I haven’t seen a lack of narrative thrust in a major motion picture as abysmal as Wonder Woman 1984 in over a decade. It’s literally first year film school student “I don’t know how to tell a story” bad. And you’re going to let this person direct the next Star Wars movie???? Oh my god.
The weekend wasn’t all bad as Pixar released their latest film on Disney +, “Soul,” and, unlike Wonder Woman 1984, Pixar actually cares about storytelling. Not only that, but this is the weirdest Pixar movie yet. It’s about a music teacher who wants to become a Jazz pianist and gets a shot at a major gig but ends up dying after the audition. He somehow avoids going to Heaven, and plummets into the “before” version of Heaven where little souls are preparing to go down to earth and become humans. He meets a soul there who hates earth and doesn’t want to become human, and then the two end up back down on earth, but the hater soul ends up in the jazz musician’s body while the jazz musician ends up in a therapy cat’s body (yes, you read that right), and the two team up to get the musician to that gig.
One thing Pixar does more and more of that I tell writers NOT TO DO is they overcomplicate things. There is so much world-building and mythology and rules that need to be established here, it’s kind of overwhelming. And they never do things the easy way. Which is harder to execute but better for the story. For example, when the two get thrust back to earth, the jazz pianist doesn’t end up in his body. He ends up in a cat’s body. It’s so weird but it’s that weirdness that makes Pixar movies different from anything else out there. They also do an amazing job with exposition. Exposition is a top 5 enemy for any screenwriter. But the reason Pixar gets away with it is that a) the things they expose are usually interesting. This whole “before dimension,” for example, is an interesting place. So we’re willing to learn about it. And b) they show instead of tell as often as possible. One of my favorite expositional pieces was the “lost souls.” These are people down on earth who have lost their way. And here in the “before dimension,” they’re represented as these spooky one-eyed monsters who trudge around this dark space endlessly. It really captured what a lost soul would look like.
I don’t think everything comes together as cohesively as it could have. But Pixar does such a great job making you care about its characters that you overlook those weaknesses and just go with it. I’m not sure where “Soul” ranks on the list of Pixar movies, but it might creep into the top 5. It’s really different and, unlike other family movies, you don’t know where it’s going. It really does surprise you again and again. Check it out if you have Disney +!
